http://www.cnn.com/2017/11/30/europe/donald-trump-theresa-may-twitter-spat/index.html In this story, the writer did a good job of explaining what happened and the people related to what is going on. They wrote what the issue was and described what happened in the first paragraph which was very helpful for someone who would like together the quick information from clicking on the article. one thing I would change about the is the organization piece If I'm looking for a specific detail on one part of the story, I have to red the whole thing rather than scrolling to a place where it might be shown. I think it would be helpful to split it up into sections where finding out more would be easier. I do like the way they wrote the story in the beginning they hooked the reader and I will try to implement that into my work. They started the story with the main points and that was helpful, but if I wanted to know more it wouldn't have been as easy to find quickly.
Popular posts from this blog
http://www.kmbc.com/article/chiefs-announce-suspension-of-marcus-peters-ahead-of-sundays-game-versus-the-raiders/14295553 This article is good because it is to the point. I think that it gave all the necessary information and was pretty specific saying what happened during the game. The article was really brief so it was kind of hard to get more information, but despite that the readers can still get the story from it which is a plus. The story needed to have more information or at least elaborate on more of he situation and why it happened the way it did. They could've put a video in to show what Marcus Peters did, or a link or something to show what happened so people can better understand. I also think that they needed to specify more that the chiefs are suspending him, and the NFL hasn't. This is knowledge I already have so when clicking into the article it already reiterated things I knew and that was not beneficial for me. One thing I will take from this is...
http://fox4kc.com/2017/12/08/independence-officer-shot-in-the-line-of-duty-will-return-home-after-months-at-nebraska-rehabilitation-center/ In this article, the writer does a good job at breaking up the different things that contribute to the story. This is helpful when looking at specific details, but not always. I think it is a short story with not as much information as they could've had, but they mentioned every detail which was good. One thing that I would change is the format, while its good that there breaking it up, it looks bad because there isn't enough content to make a paragraph and it just looks like 10 broken up sentences instead of connecting the information. They kept it short and sweet by the information they gave and the wording of things. I will take away the wording from this and try to use words that would get to the point quicker and still tell a story. This one was a little difficult to read because of the constant break in information so it woul...
Comments
Post a Comment