-
I like my video because the story line makes sense and has a problem and solution and all that. I like how it has a dog rather than a human because you can still tell what the dog is thinking and what he is trying to do. I like how the dog has a lot of detail to him and ow he wasn't just squares and rectangles. On the other hand, i don't like how there isn't much going on. I don't like how the sounds don't matches well as they could've. I think if they had more sound effects to go with it, then it would be better. I tired to get the best sound that matched possible, but there wasn't very many that went with the dog theme. I also don't like how its so short. I think the message gets across, but i also think it could have more.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

-
http://www.kmbc.com/article/one-person-killed-in-workplace-incident-possible-explosion-reported-at-olathe-garmin-headquarters/13943666 In this story the reporter did a good job of getting the main points across and laying downtime basics of what occurred. She was also good with the standup location being able to show the people they were talking abut and what the scene looked like with her there too. They also got a good shot of Garmin from above that added a lot to the story. I think the reporter could've done a better job at interviewing the guy because she says it is not hazardous and then he says the exact same thing. Also, I think she could've elaborated more on what happened rather than just saying a pipe ruptured. I think she did a good job of breaking up her words and sentences to be able to tell the difference in what she was saying all by the tone of her voice and I will try to implement that into things like the raven minute when its basically just and ...
Read more
-
http://www.kmbc.com/article/chiefs-announce-suspension-of-marcus-peters-ahead-of-sundays-game-versus-the-raiders/14295553 This article is good because it is to the point. I think that it gave all the necessary information and was pretty specific saying what happened during the game. The article was really brief so it was kind of hard to get more information, but despite that the readers can still get the story from it which is a plus.  The story needed to have more information or at least elaborate on more of he situation and why it happened the way it did. They could've put a video in to show what Marcus Peters did, or a link or something to show what happened so people can better understand. I also think that they needed to specify more that the chiefs are suspending him, and the NFL hasn't. This is knowledge I already have so when clicking into the article it already reiterated things I knew and that was not beneficial for me.  One thing I will take from this is...
Read more
-
http://www.kmbc.com/article/woman-fakes-seizure-to-avoid-would-be-mugger-that-handed-her-frightening-note/12272675 In this story, the Reporter did a good job of giving the 5 w's and getting good b-roll. The story was well told and we had a good idea of what the situation was. The standup looked good and she was easy to understand. The interview was good as well and the interviewee gave very good responses to the questions. The reporter labeled the story 'Woman fakes seizure to avoid would be mugger that handed her a frightening note' and didn't elaborate on that at all which think drew most of the views to the story in the first place. Instead, she says the woman faked a medical problem and that was all of it. Another thing the reporter could improve was asking the yes or no question rather than giving the interviewee a question they could've gone more in depth with. The interviewee did elaborate on the question, but if she hadn't, then it would've been...
Read more