http://www.kmbc.com/article/one-person-killed-in-workplace-incident-possible-explosion-reported-at-olathe-garmin-headquarters/13943666 In this story the reporter did a good job of getting the main points across and laying downtime basics of what occurred. She was also good with the standup location being able to show the people they were talking abut and what the scene looked like with her there too. They also got a good shot of Garmin from above that added a lot to the story. I think the reporter could've done a better job at interviewing the guy because she says it is not hazardous and then he says the exact same thing. Also, I think she could've elaborated more on what happened rather than just saying a pipe ruptured. I think she did a good job of breaking up her words and sentences to be able to tell the difference in what she was saying all by the tone of her voice and I will try to implement that into things like the raven minute when its basically just and ...
Popular posts from this blog
http://www.kmbc.com/article/chiefs-announce-suspension-of-marcus-peters-ahead-of-sundays-game-versus-the-raiders/14295553 This article is good because it is to the point. I think that it gave all the necessary information and was pretty specific saying what happened during the game. The article was really brief so it was kind of hard to get more information, but despite that the readers can still get the story from it which is a plus. The story needed to have more information or at least elaborate on more of he situation and why it happened the way it did. They could've put a video in to show what Marcus Peters did, or a link or something to show what happened so people can better understand. I also think that they needed to specify more that the chiefs are suspending him, and the NFL hasn't. This is knowledge I already have so when clicking into the article it already reiterated things I knew and that was not beneficial for me. One thing I will take from this is...
http://www.kmbc.com/article/mother-of-two-20-dies-one-day-after-flu-diagnosis/14200779 the good things about this article is that they got interviews and used quotes in it, but it kind of just shows what is in the video. I think from reading the article and not watching the video someone would be able to understand what happened. Something I would suggest is maybe to elaborate on the children because they're in the title of the article to grab the readers attention, but it doesn't say a lot about them. A question I was left with was how the flu killed her and they said one thing about pneumonia, but I would like to understand more about how it got to the severity or how she may have contracted a deadly case of a curable virus. I will implement the idea of using the the scientific facts and the health alerts like the stats they used in the end of the article. They said that only 10% of this years Australian vaccine was affective so it meant that they couldn't t...
Comments
Post a Comment